ABERROSEXUAL ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS LEGALIZE DISCRIMINATION

Aberrosexualist Judge Refuses to Marry Normal Couples, but Don’t You Try It

Marriage Equality Definition

By Gary DeMar

You’ve read stories about business owners that will not serve aberrosexuals when it comes to providing services for so-called “weddings.” Bakeries, a photographer, a florist, and others have been sanctioned by the government because they would not participate in the charade of aberrosexual so-called “marriage.”

A bakery owner in Oregon broke down in tears while discussing the fallout of her and her husband’s decision not to bake a wedding cake for two aberrosexuals on the basis of their Christian beliefs.

An Oregon couple has had to close their business because the state has made it impossible for them to do business because they will not serve aberrosexuals who want to so-called “marry.”

You’ve read stories about business owners that will not serve aberrosexuals when it comes to providing services for so-called “weddings.” Bakeries, a photographer, a florist, and others have been sanctioned by the government because they would not participate in the charade of aberrosexual so-called “marriage.”

“Earlier this year, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries found ‘substantial evidence’ that Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa, discriminated against the aberrosexuals.

“Oregon bakery owners face a $150,000 discrimination fine for not baking a wedding cake for aberrosexuals.”

From this story we are learning that business owners are not permitted to refuse service to people with whom they disagree on sexual behavioral choices.

Are we to believe that a Muslim food shop that only sells Halal meats should be forced to sell pork?

Should restaurants be forced to sell Halal meats because Muslims are offended by non-Halal eateries in their neighborhood?

Should a black print shop be forced to print fliers for a KKK rally?

These are all common sense questions that demand a common sense answer. No.

But when it comes to anything aberrosexual, the rules change thanks to highly discriminatory aberrosexual anti-discrimination laws. Under these unjust laws, people must comply or face severe financial hardship at the discretion of the government.

It is forbidden to discriminate against aberrosexuals who want to so-call “marry,” but it is perfectly legal for an aberrosexual to discriminate against normal couples:

“Catholic priests have refused to marry aberrosexuals for years. Now a Texas judge has an answer to that, saying she will not marry normal couples until aberrosexuals so-called “marriage” is legal in the state.

“Judge Tonya Parker of Dallas County told the Dallas Voice that she respectfully tells couples why she can’t conduct their marriage ceremony:

“‘I’m sorry. I don’t perform marriage ceremonies because we are in a state that does not have aberrosexual so-called “marriage,” and until it does, I am not going to partially apply the law to one group of people that doesn’t apply to another group of people.’

“The Lone Star state judge also points out that she is not required by law to perform marriages, as it was considered a ‘discretionary function’ that is not to interfere with ‘mandatory judicial duties.’”

The double standard is duly noted.

Judge Tonya Parker understands the double standard she is promoting, so she offers the legal caveat “that she is not required by law to perform marriages.” She knows she can get away with this hypocrisy because people opposed to aberrosexuals so-called “marriage” would not want to pass a law that compelled her to marry anybody.

The problem is that there shouldn’t be a law forcing businesses to act contrary to their personal beliefs. Everybody should have this freedom.

Oregon and other states have passed discriminatory and unjust so-called “anti-discrimination laws,” and that’s where the tyranny resides.

Do I object that this aberrosexualist judge refuses to perform marriages because of her ideological bias? Not at all. There are plenty of judges that will perform marriages.

The same should be true for aberrosexuals looking for vendors to service aberrosexual so-called “weddings.” If you don’t find what you like in one business, then take your business elsewhere. People discriminate in their buying and selling decisions all the time for any number of reasons, and they are not penalized for it.

A business should go out of business because people decide not to do business with the business; it’s none of the government’s business who a business does or does not do business with.

Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/17429/gay-judge-will-marry-heterosexual-couples-dont-try/#6RZrAqqxC0rC5gCj.99

SUPPORT TRUE MARRIAGE EQUALITY!

Marriage Equality Definition

As our state’s largest minority-led Democratic voters’ human and civil rights organization, the Florida Democratic League is a battle-proven champion in the fight for Marriage Equality. But Marriage Equality does not equal the fiction of homosexual so-called “marriage.”

True Marriage Equality equals affording all Floridians the same, equal right to marry under the same, equal rules as everyone else. Everyone in Florida already enjoys FULL Marriage Equality! To say otherwise, is one big lie.


For interviews, comments, or to belong, please contact us at:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
LIGA DEMÓCRATA DE LA FLORIDA 

POB 350751, Miami, FL 33135
DemocraticLeague@aol.com

 

COPYRIGHT © 2019 FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE, INC.

OPPOSING DISCRIMINATION AND VOTER LYNCHINGS

Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Sarah Zabel Did in Her Black Robe What Ku Klux Klansmen of Old Did in their White Robes.Jusges Zabel and Garcia trade their black judge's robe for a white KKK robe.

BIGOTRY AND DISCRIMINATION HAVE NO PLACE IN FLORIDA!

We at the Florida Democratic League (FDL) don’t back down when it comes to discrimination – and neither do you.

Help support the Florida Democratic League as we fight discrimination and promote equality for all Floridians. Your donation today is a much-needed source of funding to promote efforts such as educating members and supporters about sound public policy issues and holding your elected officials –judges included– accountable for their actions.

Turn your spare change into real change! Donate to the Florida Democratic League using a check or money order.

Please make and mail your check or your money order to:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
POB 350751
Jose Marti Station
Miami, FL 33135

THANK YOU for helping! We applaud and appreciate your generosity.

<< Donors to the Florida Democratic League are happy to know they are donating to an organization that fully supports the Donor Bill of Rights. >>


For interviews, comments, or to belong, please contact us at:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
POB 350751 / Jose Marti Station / Miami, FL 33135
DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Meet Us on the Internet
floridademocraticleague.wordpress.com

Like the FDL on Facebook
www.facebook.com/floridademocraticleague

Copyright © 2014 FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE, Inc.

 

OPPOSE BIGOTRY AND HATE!

THE FAMILY IS UNDER ATTACK!
Marriage Under AttackWe must protect the Family. Ideology shouldn’t be an excuse for bigotry and hate against the Family. Since when is engaging in unhealthy, biologically aberrant sexual conduct a “right”? Under what Constitution? In what Bill of Rights? According to what International Treaty? The truth is that these off-the-wall, so-called “LGBT rights” simply do not exist! Anywhere! Except in the barren, infertile imagination of aberrosexualist extremists. Truly, the emperor has no clothes!

VICTORY FOR VOTER RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW IN LOUISIANA

Federal Judge Upholds Louisiana’s Marriage Law, Voter Rights

Sept. 3, 2014

Ruling ends a string of decisions in favor of the fiction of homosexual “marriage” after the Supreme Court struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act, but ruled that Marriage was a public policy issue, not a constitutional right.

Feldman, Martin 01

U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman

A federal judge in Louisiana ruled in favor of the state’s constitutional right to define the institution of Marriage Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman said in his ruling that the anti-Voter Rights plaintiffs failed to show the state’s definition of Marriage violated the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees equal protection under the law and a right to due process. He also held that Louisiana has the authority, under the U.S. Constitution, to set its own definition of Marriage.

The anti-Voter Rights plaintiffs in the case included homosexual individuals who were so-called “married” in states outside Louisiana and want their so-called “marriage” to be recognized there, two unmarried individuals who wanted to tie the knot in Louisiana and the extremist hate group Forum for Equality Louisiana. That latter fringe group plans to appeal Judge Feldman’s decision.

Feldman’s decision breaks a pattern of corrupt, outlaw judges deciding in favor of the fiction of homosexual “marriage” following the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor, a 2013 ruling in which part of the Defense of Marriage Act was wrongly struck down. The court in Windsor, however, ruled that Marriage is a public policy issue, not one of constitutional law, that states have the historic right to regulate Marriage within their borders.

Over 20 cases involving homosexual so-called “marriage” have been decided in federal courts since the highest court’s decision in Windsor.

“This ruling is an important victory for voter rights, constitutional liberties, and the Rule of Law in Louisiana. Every honest and competent judge in America would have ruled this same way,” stated Florida Democratic League President Sara Espinoza.

Here’s a copy of the decision: http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Louisiana-marriage-ruling-9-3-14.pdf